DIGITALIZATION AS A CHALLENGE TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF VALUES:FROM INSTRUMENTAL RATIONALITY TO ALGORITHMIC CULTURE


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2025.98.89-99

Vitalii Boichuk

Abstract


The article offers a comprehensive philosophical and axiological analysis of digitalization as one of the most significant transformations of contemporary civilization. Digitalization is examined not merely as technological advancement or the modernization of social infrastructures, but as a profound shift in the very mode of human existence, thinking, and cultural reproduction. The core focus of the study is the transformation of rationality: from the instrumental model characteristic of the modern era – oriented toward efficiency, control, and the rational mastery of the world – to algorithmic rationality shaped by digital technologies. Algorithmic rationality, grounded in computation, correlation-based logic, and the prediction of behavioral patterns, increasingly replaces traditional philosophical categories such as truth, goodness, freedom, and responsibility, thereby prompting a reconsideration of established axiological foundations within the humanities.
The article emphasizes the potential of digitalization for fostering open science, collective intelligence, digital humanism, and the integration of ethical norms into technological design. Digitalization, it is argued, can not only provoke a crisis of traditional values but also generate new forms of social interaction, participation, and creativity that expand the horizon of humanistic possibilities. At the same time, the realization of these possibilities depends on society’s capacity to critically evaluate algorithmic mechanisms and to implement principles of ethical design.
The study demonstrates that digitalization is not simply a techno-scientific phenomenon but a civilizational challenge that necessitates a renewal of the axiological paradigm. The philosophy of values must integrate contemporary technological realities into a humanistic discourse and cultivate a new mode of thinking capable of combining technological efficiency with the protection of human autonomy, dignity, and moral responsibility. Such an approach enables the preservation of the human dimension in a world increasingly shaped by the logic of algorithms and informational networks.


Keywords


digitalization; algorithmic rationality; values; Big Data; subjectivity; algorithmic culture; ethical design

References


Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.327 р.

Floridi, L. (2019). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press. 272 р.

Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

Weber, M. (n.d.). Zweckrationalität. Philosophie – Wissenschaft – Kontroversen. https://www.philosophie-wissenschaft-kontroversen.de/details_wirtschaft_politik.php?id=1396871&a=t&vorname=Max&autor=Weber&thema=Zweckrationalit%C3%A4t

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 2). Beacon Press. 464 p.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs. 478 p.

Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262537841/cybernetics-or-control-and-communication-in-the-animal-and-the-machine/

Mayer, A. (2025). Open Science [Presentation slides]. Digital Humanities Summer School 2025. https://caiml.org/dighum/summerschool2025/program/slides/DHSS25-Openscience-Mayer.pdf

Virilio, P. (2009). Le futurisme de l’instant: Stop-eject. Galilée. 96 p.

IBM Redbooks. (2009). Implementing IBM Cognos BI V10.1: Architecture and deployment guide (SG24-7620-00). IBM. https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247620.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026