POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CHALLENGES OF LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES UNDER THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IN THE USA


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2025.95.261-273

Аnatoly Tkach

Abstract


The article is devoted to the deepening trends of the US influence on the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean. In terms of trade, economy and finance, Latin America is increasingly “squeezed” between the US and China, which account for more than half of the total trade turnover of Latin American countries, as well as the most important part of investments and credit resources entering the region. This circumstance has a strong impact on the structure and direction of foreign economic relations and foreign policy contacts. Significant differences in the near future of the foreign policy of Latin American countries are outlined as determining the actions of the US and China, which are involved in a hybrid war for dominance in the world economy and trade. A promising research vector of public opinion of Latin Americans regarding the resolution of trade wars and other types of US-Chinese confrontation can harm the development of the world economy and harm the most important interests of the region, which is critically dependent on international commodity and financial markets. It is noted that the main task is to diversify the international relations of Latin American states, expand the circle of their economic and political partners. Only in this way can Latin America’s hyperdependence on the USA and the PRC be weakened, as well as overcome the negative consequences of protectionist policies and trade wars initiated by the US administration. It is substantiated that the activity is of a diplomatic and strategic nature. Great Britain and Germany are traditionally present in the region, deepening economic, trade, and investment ties with Latin American countries. Iran first became closer to the region, developing ties with Venezuela. The features of the LACB policy on recovery after a protracted decline in economic activity are studied. After a two-year decline in indicators in 2016, there was an expansion in 2017 and continued to recover in 2018. It is argued that the region has been facing uncertainty stemming from external factors that could undermine growth.

Keywords


US foreign policy; foreign policy influence; aid; integration; economic policy; Latin American vector; security; political stability

References


Schandeler, Nadia (2013, november). UNASUR y el Consejo de Defensa Suramericano. Retos y desafíos cap una política de defensa común para region, Centro Argentino de Estudios Internacionales, Programa Integración Regional, Argentina

Malamud, Carlos (2014). The TTIP and MERCOSUR, in in Roy, Joaquín and Roberto Domínguez (eds.) The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership between the European Union and the United States, Miami-Florida European Union Center Jean Monnet Chair-Argentine Council of Foreign Relations (CARI), Buenos Aires, 173-183.

Soriano, Juan Pablo (2007). Brasil en la política exterior de México: la búsqueda de una relación más dinámica (ARI), Real Instituto Elcano, ARI Nº 94/2007-12/09/2007. Available at: http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano/contenido?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/ elcano/elcano_es/zonas_es/ari94-2007.

Orozco Gutiérrez Stefania. (2013). Analisis comparado del uso de los codis geopolíticos empleados por México y Brasil en su posicionamiento como líderes regionales. Periodo 2004-2010, Facultad de Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Señora del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia, 127 р.

Serbin, Andrés (2014). Atlántico vs. Pacífico?: Mega-acuerdos e implicaciones geo-estratégicas para América Latina y el Caribe, en Anuario de la Integración Regional de América Latina y el Caribe, No. 10, Coordinadora Regional de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 188 р.

Izquierdo, A. & Talvi E. (2011). One Region,Two Speeds?: Challenges of the New Global Economic Order for Latin America and the Caribbean, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, 98 р.

Ahmed, S., Appendino M. & Ruta M. (2015). “Depreciations without exports? Global value chains and the exchange rate elasticity of exports”. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 7390, World Bank Group, Washington, DC, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/ en/689841468189545684 /Depreciations-withoutexports-global-value-chains-and-the- exchange-rate-elasticity-ofexports.

Giordano, P. (co-ordinator) (2016). Trade and Integration Monitor 2016: Downshifting: Latin America and the Caribbean in the New Normal of Global Trade, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, 58 р.

Giordano, P., Ramos А. & Michalczewsky K. (2017). Trade Trend Estimates: Latin America and the Caribbean, 2017 Edition update 1Q, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, 212 р.

OECD/ECLAC/CIAT/IDB (2017). Revenue Statistics in Latin America and the Caribbean 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris, 231 р.

ECLAC (2017), Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean 2017, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago, http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/41047/1/S1700070_en.pdf

Avendano, R., Melguizo A. & Miner S. (2017). Chinese FDI in Latin America: New Trends with Global Implications, Atlantic Council/ OECD Development Centre, Washington, DC, http://publications.atlanticcouncil.org/china-fdi-latin-america/.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026