POSITIVE PEACE FOR RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR ANALYSIS


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2022.89.147-159

Anna Taranenko (Тараненко Ганна Геннадіївна)

Abstract


Positive peace is an important concept in studying international conflicts. It is urgent to study the viability of positive peace theory to Russia-Ukraine war analysis. The applied method is historical and comparative approach. As a result, it can be concluded that positive peace framework is, overall, applicable for Russia-Ukraine war analysis. In line with the positive peace agenda, it is necessary to develop strong democratic institutions, promote fair business growth, civil liberties, diplomacy and rule of law. Ukraine is further progressing toward this goal, while Russia, on the contrary, demonstrates a trend toward strengthening of authoritaorianism and even outright violation of international law after recognition of «DPR» and «LPR» and the ongoing military aggression against Ukraine. Such different political stances of the two countries’ leadership complicate effective settlement of Russian-Ukrainian war.
It can be concluded that much depends on skillfulness and diplomatic experience of primary negotiators, as well as mediators. One should carefully consider use of mediator services and good offices and thereby select mediators who are objective, impartial, trusted by both parties and, besides, who have successful experience of previous mediation cases and establishing dialogue. One of the main international organizations involved in the war settlement since its start have been the UN and the OSCE. However, international organizations, overall, demonstrated partial effectiveness in preventing the Russian-Ukrainian war and achieving de-escalation of violence. One should keep in mind the statement that every peace process is unique, moreover, it is imperative to take into consideration local contexts and strive to achieve positive peace conditions.


Keywords


international security; Ukraine; Russia-Ukraine war; UN; OSCE; positive peace; democracy

References


Bebler, A. (2015). Frozen Conflicts in Europe. Opladen, Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich

Zellner, W. (2019). Rol i perspektivy OBSE v preodolenii eskalacii. Role and Prospects of the OSCE in Overcoming Escalation In Bor»ba za Ukraynu. Otstayvanye prava na samoopredelenye y sxvatka heopolytycheskyx ynteresov. Fight for Ukraine: Delay of Self-Identification Right and Clash of Geopolitical Interests, Justenhoven, Heinz-Gerhard (ed). Uzhgorod: Karpatska Vezha, 167 — 184.

Turan, T. (2016). Positive Peace in Theory and Practice. Brill. Nijhoff: E-Book (PDF), https://doi. org/10.1163/9789004305618 (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Abidi, C. B. (2018). Educational Frameworks for Building Cultures of Peace. Challenging Constructions of an Enemy. In: Pedagogies for Building Cultures of Peace. Brill. E-Book, 18-27, https://doi. org/10.1163/9789004375239_004 (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Comparative Historical Approaches. American Sociological Association. https://www.asanet.org/topics/comparativehistorical-approaches#:~:text=%E2%80%9CComparative%E2%80%9D%20studies%20examine%20and%20contrast,while%20looking%20for%20general%20patterns (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Positive Peace Report (2020). Analysing the Factors that Sustain Peace.Institute for Economics & Peace. https://reliefweb. int/sites/reliefweb. int/files/resources/PPR-2020web_0.pdf (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Pillars for Peaceful Societies. European Commission https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/foresight/topic/changing-security-paradigm/strategies-sustain-peaceful-societies_en (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Reanimation Package of Reforms Annual Report (2018). ReanimationPackage of Reforms Annual Report. Reanimation Package of Reforms, https://rpr.org.ua/en/annual-reports/ (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Yatsun, B. (2018). Roadmap of reforms 2019–2023. ReanimationPackage of Reforms. Center for Democracy and Rule of Law, https://rpr.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/DKR-RPR-2019–2023-ENG.pdf (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Orlova, V. (2022, March 3). Crime Level in Ukraine Dropped Nearlyto Zero During the War. Riven Zlochynnosti Znyzyvsia v Ukraini pid Chas Viyny Mayzhe do Nulia. Unian. https://www.unian.ua/society/riven-zlochinnosti-znizivsya-v-ukrajini-pid-chas-viyni-mayzhe-do-nulya-novini-ukrajini-11727097.html (accessed date May 9, 2022)

McFaul, M. (2021). Russia’ Road to Autocracy. Journal of Democracy,32 (4), 11-26. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/russias-road-to-autocracy/ (accessed date May 9, 2022)

On Russia’s Ongoing Aggression against Ukraine and Illegal Occupationof Crimea (2021, December 9). Ongoing Violations of International Law and Defiance of OSCE Principles and Commitments by the Russian Federation in Ukraine as delivered by Chargé d’Affaires Courtney Austrian to the Permanent Council, Vienna. U.S. Mission to the OSCE. https://osce.usmission.gov/on-russias-ongoing-aggression-against-ukraine-and-illegal-occupation-of-crimea-45/ (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Douglas, R. (2014). Law, Liberty and the Pursuit of Terrorism. AnnArbor: University of Michigan Press

Gorchinskaya, K. (2019). The Normandy Summit Ended With No Breakthroughs. What Has It Achieved? Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/katyagorchinskaya/2019/12/10/the-normandy-summit-ended-what-has-it-achieved/#4dda167c3061 (accessed date May 9, 2022)

dniv tyshi na Donbasi zberehly zhyttia desiatkam ukrayinskyhvoyiniv. 100 Days of Ceasefire at Donbas Saved Lives of Dozens of Ukrainian Soldiers. (2020). 100 dniv tyshi na Donbasi zberehly zhyttia desiatkam ukrayinskyh voyiniv, 5.11.2020. Ofis Prezydenta. Office of the President of Ukraine, https://t.me/OP_UA/3166 (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Ukraine. Events of 2021 (2022). World Report 2022. Human RightsWatch https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2022/country-chapters/ukraine (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Russia’s War Crimes in Ukraine: OSCE Report Could Be Used inTribunal (April 14, 2022). Unian https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/3457375-russias-war-crimes-in-ukraine-osce-report-could-be-used-in-tribunal. html (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Daily and Spot Reports from the Special Monitoring Mission toUkraine (2020). Daily and Spot Reports from the Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, https://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm/reports (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Peterson, J. H. (2014). Building a Peace Economy? LiberalPeacebuilding and the Development-security Industry. Manchester: Manchester University Press

Montiel, C. J. & de Guzman, J. M. (2011). Social Representationsof a Controversial Peace Agreement: Subjective Public Meanings of the GRP-MILF MOA. Philippine Political Science Journal, 32 (1), 37–72, https://doi.org/10.1163/2165025X-03201002 (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Hemmer, B. et al. (2006). Putting the «Up» in Bottom-up Peacebuilding:Broadening the Concept of Peace Negotiations. International Negotiation, 11 (1), 129–162, https://doi. org/10.1163/157180606777835739 (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Joint Centre for Control and Coordination (JCCC) (2020). JointCentre for Control and Coordination (JCCC). Outriders, https://outride.rs/en/temat/joint-centre-for-control-and-coordination-jccc/ (accessed date May 9, 2022)

Brunova-Kalisecka, I. et al. (2020). Dialoh v modeli pravosuddiaperexidnoho period: osoblyvosti i funkcii. Dialogue in the Transitional Justice Model: Peculiarities and Functions. Kyiv: Nacionalna platforma.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026