THE IMPERATIVE MANDATE AS A MECHANISM FOR POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY IMPLEMENTATION


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2025.94.125-142

Ganna Malkina

Abstract


The article explores the imperative mandate as a potential tool for enhancing the political responsibility of subjects in representative bodies of power within the context of the crisis phenomena of modern democracy. The relevance of the topic is determined by the increasing political irresponsibility, which correlates with a decline in the quality of political governance, a crisis of public trust in institutions, the growth of protest sentiments, and societal polarization. The aim of the article is to analyze the imperative mandate as a means of ensuring real, not formal, accountability of representatives, to identify critical concerns regarding its implementation, and to seek alternative approaches to strengthening political responsibility. The paper conducts a theoretical analysis of the concepts of political responsibility, free and imperative mandates, examines their historical evolution and reflection in the constitutional legislation of various countries. A comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of both types of mandates is carried out. Particular attention is paid to the study of the practice of the partyimperative mandate and its impact on the accountability of deputies, as well as the analysis of the possibilities of applying the institution of recall of elected officials. Critically assessing the traditional view on the incompatibility of the imperative mandate with democratic principles, the author refers to the modern scientific discourse that rethinks its potential role in the context of the crisis of representative democracy. The conclusions of the article emphasize the need for a balanced approach to the issue of political responsibility, combining elements of accountability with a sufficient level of independence of representatives.

Keywords


political responsibility; representative democracy; crisis of democracy; imperative mandate; free mandate; party-imperative mandate; recall of deputies; semi-directed mandate; accountability; legitimacy

References


Shliakhtun, P. P. (2005). Constitutional Law: Dictionary of Terms. Kyiv: Lybid, 568 p.

Malkina, H. M. (2010). Political Responsibility in a Democratic Society (Institutional Aspect): Monograph. Kyiv: Publishing and Printing Center "Kyiv University", 326 p.

Constitutions of the Countries of the World: Kingdom of Belgium, Federal Republic of Germany, Kingdom of Sweden / O.V. Korotiuk, O.V. Lavrynovych. Kyiv: OVK, 2021, 370 p.

Constitutions of the Countries of the World: Italian Republic, Vatican City State, Constitutions of the Kingdom of Spain, Portuguese Republic / O.V. Korotiuk, O.V. Lavrynovych. Kyiv: OVK, 2021, 320 p.

Constitutions of the Countries of the World: Republic of Latvia, Republic of Lithuania, Republic of Estonia / O.V. Korotiuk, O.V. Lavrynovych. Kyiv: OVK, 2022, 162 p.

Constitutions of the Countries of the World: Kingdom of Denmark, French Republic, Czech Republic, Republic of Poland / O.V. Korotiuk, O.V. Lavrynovych. Kyiv: OVK, 2021, 32 p.

Constitutions of the Countries of the World: Republic of Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Republic of Croatia / O.V. Korotiuk, O.V. Lavrynovych. Kyiv: OVK, 2021, 250 p.

Report on the Imperative Mandate and Similar Practice / adopted by the Council for Democratic Elections at its 28th meeting (Venice, 14 March 2009). URL: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD (2009)027-e (accessed: 15.04.2025).

Rousseau, J.-J. (2001). The Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right / Trans. from French and commentary by O. Khoma. Kyiv: Port-Royal, 349 p.

Chepel, O.D. (2010). Representative Mandate of Parliamentarians: Main Development Trends. Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University. Law. Issue 538, 53–57.

Constant, B. (2009). “The Liberty of Ancients Compared with That of Moderns”. In: Liberalism: Anthology. 2nd ed. / Comp. by O. Protsenko, V. Lisovyi. Kyiv: VD “Prostir”, “Smoloskyp”, 1128 p.

Burke, E. (1774). Speech to the Electors of Bristol. URL: https://www.digitens.org/en/anthologies/speech-electors-bristol-1774.html (accessed: 15.04.2025).

Constitutions of the Countries of the World: Swiss Confederation, Kingdom of Norway, Republic of Finland / O.V. Korotiuk, O.V. Lavrynovych. Kyiv: OVK, 2021, 180 p.

Romaniuk, P. V. (2013). Imperative Mandate: Selected Issues of Constitutional Theory and Practice in Modern Conditions. Bulletin of Mariupol State University. Series: Law, Issue 5, 240–245. URL: https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/12264/1/Romaniuk_240-245.pdf

Constitutions of the Countries of the World: Constitution of the Hellenic Republic, Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus, Constitution of the Republic of Turkey / O.V. Korotiuk, O.V. Lavrynovych. Kyiv: OVK, 2021, 404 p.

Tomba, M. (2018). Who’s Afraid of the Imperative Mandate

Critical Times, Vol. 1 (1), 108–119. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d637/9608aec5e89051db2e4da974e831db8d4b69.pdf?_ga=2.179912996.1829784398.1645011612?1849924878.1645011612 (accessed: 15.04.2025).

Vandamme, P. (2024). Rethinking the Imperative Mandate: Toward a Better Balance between Independence and Accountability. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 68. URL: https://ajps.org/2024/12/19/rethinkingthe-imperative-mandate-toward-a-better-balance-between-independenceand-accountability (accessed: 15.04.2025).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026