CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE NOTION «POLITICAL COALITION» IN SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2025.97.217-231

Oleg Horai

Abstract


A comprehensive analysis of the state and features of the scientific understanding of the concept and phenomenon of "political coalition" in modern political science has been carried out, identifying the main theoretical directions, methodological approaches and discursive aspects in this issue. The genesis and evolution of the conceptual apparatus of political coalition research have been analyzed. Existing scientific approaches and main theoretical schools have been systematized. Typological approaches to the classification of political coalitions according to functional, institutional, temporal, ideological and geographical criteria have been characterized. The existence of three influential research traditions has been revealed: American (with an emphasis on formal modeling), European (with attention to institutional aspects) and Ukrainian as part of the post-Soviet (focused on the specifics of transit democracies). Key problematic issues of modern scientific discourse have been identified, including terminological uncertainty, methodological limitations and challenges of the digital age. The considerable complexity and multifaceted nature of coalition processes have been revealed, which requires the development of integrative theoretical approaches. The prospects for further development of the theory of political coalitions in the context of the transformation of modern political systems have been outlined. It is concluded that the evolution of the conceptual apparatus of political coalition research demonstrates a gradual transition from descriptive and institutional-legal approaches to complex formalized theoretical models and multi-paradigm analysis; the latest trends indicate the growth of methodological pluralism and the emergence of alternative theoretical approaches; an important direction is the expansion of the geographical and cultural representativeness of research through the inclusion of the experience of non-Western political systems; understanding the mechanisms of coalition formation and functioning is critically important for the development of institutional reforms, increasing the effectiveness of political representation, and ensuring the stability of democratic institutions.

Keywords


political coalition; coalition theory; political science; coalition behavior; research traditions; coalition typology; institutional analysis; transit democracies; methodological pluralism; digital age

References


Max Weber on Rationality in Social Action, in Sociological Analysis, and in Modern Life. URL: https://www.rational-action.com/hello-world/ (access date: 25.06.2025). [in English].

Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen, 439 p. [in English].

Riker, W. H. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press, 300 p. [in English].

Gamson, W. A. (1964). Experimental Studies of Coalition Formation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 1, 81–110. [in English].

De Swaan, A. (1973). Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 347 p. [in English].

Strom, K. (1990). Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 284 p. [in English].

Diermeier, D. & Stevenson, A. (1999). Government Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies. American Political Science Review, Vol. 93, No, 365–379. [in English].

Golder ,S. N. (2006). The Logic of Pre-electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus : Ohio State University Press, 248 p. [in English].

Kopynets, Y. Y. (2021). The Influence of Modern Trends in the Development of Party Systems of the European Union Countries on the Evolution and Functioning of the Party System of Ukraine: Dissertation ... Candidate of Political Science: 23.00.02. Uzhgorod, 269 p. [in Ukrainian].

Kornienko, V.O., Denisyuk, S.G. & Shiyan, A.A. (2009). Modeling Processes in the Political-Communicative Space: Monograph. Vinnytsia: UNIVERSUM-Vinnytsia, 185 p. [in Ukrainian].

Guseva, N. Yu., Filipenko, L. P. & Gerasymovych, V. A. (2024). Political communication in the era of digital technologies: opportunities and risks for democracy. Politicus: scientific journal, No. 5, 24–29. [in Ukrainian].

Steshenko, N. L., Bolotina, E. V. & Chosta, K. S. (2022). Big Data technologies as a system of modern methods of political influence. Regional studios. Uzhgorod: Helvetica Publishing House, Issue 31, 44–48. [in Ukrainian].

Ludva, A. & Dvorovy M. (2022). Digital technologies and the electoral process: EU standards in protection of democratic choice. Analytical report. Kyiv: NGO “Digital Security Laboratory”, 30 p. [in Ukrainian].

Axelrod, R. (1970). Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham, 234 p. [in English].

Martin, L. W. & Vanberg G. (2003). Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 47, No. 1, 33–50. [in English].

Howard, P. N. & Hussain, M. R. (2013). Digital Media and Political Engagement Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 256 p. [in English].


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026