THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE IN THE ANCIENT THOUGHT


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2025.94.98-113

Yuriy Hryhorak

Abstract


The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of religious tolerance in the ancient world, analyzing the influence of political structures, social traditions and philosophical concepts on the formation of the boundaries of freedom of religion. Special attention is paid to the mechanisms of interaction between the state and religion, as well as the influence of legal norms on the perception of religious diversity. It is proved, that in the Greek polis, religious rituals were an integral part of civic identity, contributing to the formation of ideas about the acceptability of various cults. Philosophical issues related to freedom of thought and critical reflection on faith were reflected in the works of thinkers who investigated the nature of the divine and its relationship to human life. For example, Xenophanes criticized anthropomorphic ideas about the gods, while Protagoras questioned the possibility of knowing the divine, which stimulated discussions about religious tolerance. It is argued, Ancient historians such as Herodotus and Polybius recorded the dynamics of public attitudes towards religious innovations, noting both cases of acceptance and rejection of new cults. In the Roman context, the imperial strategies for adapting to religious diversity are explored, which combined elements of integration and control. The Roman policy of "inclusive syncretism" allowed the inclusion of the deities of conquered peoples in the pantheon, which contributed to the strengthening of imperial unity. It is found that the legal and social mechanisms that defined the limits of religious tolerance had a significant impact on the transformation of religious policy in the period of late antiquity. The Edict of Milan of 313, issued by Constantine the Great, legalized Christianity, which was an important step towards the recognition of religious pluralism. However, later, with the growing influence of Christianity, there was a restriction of traditional pagan cults, which indicates the complexity and ambiguity of the processes of religious tolerance in antiquity. Thus, the article provides a comprehensive analysis of the factors that influenced the formation and transformation of religious tolerance in ancient society, emphasizing the relationship between the political, social and philosophical aspects of this phenomenon.

Keywords


Antiquity; philosophy; tolerance; religious tolerance; freedom of religion; Greco-Roman world

Full Text:

PDF>PDF

References


Beard M., North J., Price S. (1998). Religions of Rome. Volume I, illustrated, reprint. Cambridge University Press. [Online]: http://khazarzar.skeptik.net/books/rel_rom1.pdf

Aristides, Aelius (1829). Orationes. Wilhelm Dindorf, Ed. ex recensione Guilielmi Dindorfii. Leipzig. Weidmann.

Neusner J., Chilton B. D. (2008). Religious Tolerance in World Religions. Templeton Foundation Press.

Turenko, V. (2024). Sappho Between Friends and Enemies: Specifics of View on Human Relationships, Linguistic and Conceptual Views of the World, 75 (1), 139-153.

Strabo. (1877). Geographica. Ed. A. Meineke. Leipzig: Teubner.

Homer. (1920). Opera in five volumes. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Herodotus (1920). Histories, 2.3. In: Herodotus, with an English translation by A. D. Godley. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Plato. (1903). Theaetetus. Platonis Opera, ed. John Burnet. Oxford University Press.

Turenko, V., & Netetska, E. (2024). Empedocles’ philosophy of politics and law: between practice and theory, SOPHIA. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin, 22 (2), 82?85. https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2023.22.16

Merced-Ownbey, D. Jasmine. (2008). Roman Isis and the Pendulum of Tolerance in the Empire." Inquiry: The University of Arkansas Undergraduate Research Journal, vol. 9, 2008, Article 12. Available at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/inquiry/vol9/iss1/12

Turenko, V. (2024). Critique of contemporary Classics: between rejection and acceptance. Umachandran, M., & Ward, Μ. (Eds.). (2024). Critical Ancient World Studies: The Case for Forgetting Classics. London: Routledge. Sententiae, 43 (2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent43.02.153


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026