NATIONAL IDENTITY AND THE NATIONAL IDEA AS A FACTOR OF STATE-BUILDING
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2020.85.174-189
Abstract
Although it is obvious that an adequate account of the notion of national identity requires a certain understanding of national consciousness, there is still no generally accepted theory regarding the latter. The article considers the connection of state-building and nation-building. The most important tool of nation-building is the dissemination of national consciousness and national identity. The article analyzes the creation of a national idea and considers the major reasons for the incompleteness of Ukrainian nation-building, which results from a lack of political consensus and a comparatively low level of the cultural development of Ukrainian society. For this purpose, we have researched various political materials from web resources using the tools of a structural-functional approach, discourse analysis and content analysis. The study opens deeper insights into the genuine values, interests, motives, stereotypes, attitudes, strategies and tactics of some politicians.
No aspect of national idea is more more puzzling than nation consciousness and national identity. Despite the lack of any agreed upon theory of national consciousness, there is a widespread, if less than universal, understand that an adequate account of national identity requires a clear understanding of it. We need to understand both what nation consciousness, national identity, national idea, nation and state-building.
Therefore the problem of Ukrainian nation and state building results from contradictory ideas od Ukrainian politicians, the lack of a common national idea as such, and the dissemination of false information among the electorate.
Keywords
Full Text:
>PDF (Українська)
References
Ghyrych, I. (2014). Ukrajinsjki intelektualy i politychna okremishnistj (seredyna ХІХ — pochatok ХХ st. ): Monoghrafija. Kyjiv: Ukrajinsjkyjpysjmennyk. [In Ukrainian]
Anderson, B. (2001). Ujavleni spiljnoty. Mirkuvannja shhodo pokhodzhennja j poshyrennja nacionalizmu. Kyjiv: Krytyka. [InUkrainian]
Bergher, P. (1995). Kapitalistychna revoljucija: p’jatdesjat propozycij shhodo procvitannja, rivnosti i svobody: Monoghrafija. Kyjiv: Vyshhashkola. [In Ukrainian]
Breuilly, John. (1993). Nationalism and the State. Manchester: Manchester University Press. [In English]
Gelner, E. (2003). Naciji ta nacionalizm; Nacionalizm: Per. z anghl. Kyjiv: Takson. [In Ukrainian]
Hobsbawm, E. (1995). Nations and Nationalism since 1780. Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[In English]
Smit, E. (1994). Nacionaljna identychnistj. Kyjiv: «Osnovy». [In Ukrainian]
Fukujama, F. (2020). Identychnistj. Potreba v ghidnosti j polityka skryvdzhenosti. Kyjiv: Nash format. [In Ukrainian]
Jermolenko, A.M. (2019).Cinnisni zminy etnosu jak chynnyk tvorennja modernoji identychnosti ukrajinsjkoji naciji. Transformacijaukrajinsjkoji nacionaljnoji ideji / uporjad. O. Donij. Kyjiv: Nashformat. P. 107–129. [In Ukrainian]
Karmazina, M.S. (2015). Mizh istorijeju i politykoju. Kyjiv: IPiEND im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrajiny. [In Ukrainian]
Kulyk, V.M. (2010). Dyskurs ukrajinsjkykh medij: identychnosti, ideologhiji, vladni stosunky: monoghrafija. Kyjiv: Krytyka. [InUkrainian]
Majboroda, O.M. (2017). Etnichnistj u mizhnarodnij systemi. Vyd. 2-e, vypr. i dopov. Kyjiv: IPiEND im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrajiny. [InUkrainian]
Rymarenko, Ju. S. (2010). Etnopolitychna kuljtura v Ukrajini: realiji ta vyklyky chasu. Kyjiv: IPiEND imeni I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrajiny. [InUkrainian]
Rjabchuk, M.Ju. (2019). Dolannja ambivalentnosti. Dykhotomija ukrajinsjkoji nacionaljnoji identychnosti. — Istorychni prychyny tapolitychni naslidky. Kyjiv: IPiEND im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrajiny. [InUkrainian]
Stepyko, M.T. (2015). Problemy identyfikaciji ghromadjan Ukrajiny v umovakh inozemnoji aghresiji. Mizhnarodnyj naukovyj forum:sociologhija, psykhologhija, pedaghoghika, menedzhment: zbirnyknaukovykh pracj / red. kol.: Jevtukh, V.B. (ghol. red. ). Kyjiv: TOV«NVP «Interservis», Vyp. 18. P. 31–41. [In Ukrainian]
Merton, R. (2006). Socyaljnaja teoryja y socyaljnaja struktura/Moskva: ACT, Khranytelj. [In Russian]
Phillips, N. (2002). What Is Discourse Analysis? N. Phillips and C. Hardy Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes Of SocialConstruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. P. 1–18. [In English]
Kostenko, N., Ivanov, V. (2003). Dosvid kontent-analizu. Modeli ta praktyky. Kyjiv: Centr viljnoji presy. [In Ukrainian]
Politychna encyklopedija. (2011). Redkol.: Ju. Levenecj (gholova), Ju. Shapoval (zast. gholovy) ta in. Kyjiv: Parlamentsjke vydavnyctvo. [InUkrainian]
Pro zabezpechennja funkcionuvannja ukrajinsjkoji movy jak derzhavnoji. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2704–19#Text. (data zvernennja: 24.09.2020).
Franko, I.Ja. (1986). Zibrannja tvoriv u 50-y tomakh. Kyjiv: Naukova dumka. T. 45, 578 p. [In Ukrainian]
Sociologhichna ghrupa «Rejtyngh». URL: http://ratinggroup.ua/.(data zvernennja: 28.09.2020).
Mala encyklopedija etnoderzhavoznavstva. (1996). NANU, In-t derzhavy i prava im. V.M. Korecjkogho. redkol.: Rymarenko Ju. I.(vidp. red. ) ta in. Kyjiv: Gheneza. [In Ukrainian]
Ghabermas, Ju. (2005). Ghromadjanstvo i nacionaljna identychnistj// Umovy ghromadjanstva: Zb. st. / Pid redakcijeju Varta vanStinberghena: Per. z anghl., peredmova ta prymitky Ivanenko O.O. Kyjiv: Ukrajinsjkyj Centr dukhovnoji kuljtury. P. 49–70. [In Ukrainian]
Vodak, R. (1997). Jazyk. Dyskurs. Polytyka. Volghoghrad: Peremena. [In Russian]
Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis and the study of doctor-patient interaction. The Construction of Professional Discourse / ed. by B.L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, B. Nordberg. London: Longman. P. 173–200. [In English]
Veb-portal partiji «Slugha narodu». URL: https://sluga-narodu.com/. (data zvernennja: 28.09.2020).
Veb-portal partiji «Opozycijna platforma — Za zhyttja». URL: https://zagittya.com.ua/. (data zvernennja: 28.09.2020).
Veb-portal partiji «Jevropejsjka solidarnistj». URL: https://eurosolidarity.org/. (data zvernennja: 28.09.2020).
Veb-portal partiji «Batjkivshhyna». URL: https://ba.org.ua/. (datazvernennja: 28.09.2020).
Veb-portal partiji «Za majbutnje». URL: https://zamajbutne.com.ua/. (data zvernennja: 28.09.2020).
Ghabermas, Ju. (1996). Komunikatyvna dija i dyskurs — dvi formy povsjakdennoji komunikaciji / Per. z nimecjkoji // L. Sytnychenko. Pershodzherela komunikatyvnoji filosofiji. Kyjiv: Lybidj. P. 84–90. [In Ukrainian]
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026






