FEATURES OF THE POWER LEGITIMATION IN THE AGE OF POSTMODERNISM


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2020.84.119-127

Anastasiia Onishchenko (Оніщенко Анастасія Володимирівна)

Abstract


The crisis of legitimacy is an urgent problem in modern political science. After all, a necessary condition for the functioning of any democratic state is the legitimacy of power, recognition and support of the majority of the population.
The main methods used for this article are: political science — analysis of specialized scientific sources allowed to identify specific features of political science interpretation of key concepts and trace their development within political science, comparative — allowed to compare modernist and postmodernist approach to understanding the legitimacy of power and identify their main features, systematic approach, allowed to consider complex and multifaceted process with the corresponding internal and external features of functioning, historical — research of transformation of understanding of concept of legitimacy.
This article reveals the characteristic features of legitimacy in the pre-modern and modern times, however, the main focus is on the features of the legitimation of power in the postmodern era. Among them: the presence in the public consciousness and information space of a negative image of government and politics; total individualism; departure from modernist rationalism in the direction of creative search; legitimation through work with meanings, texts and images; rejection of the concept of «patience for the sake of the future» and the transition to the dominance of consumer society; the requirement to meet the needs of the «here and now». Through the active involvement of economic, cultural, religious and other spheres in politics, today we can speak of the disappearance of legitimacy in its pure form and the establishment of its connection with other socio-political and economic phenomena. Thus, to study this phenomenon today it is necessary to use the tools of other sciences, especially economics.


Keywords


legitimacy; power; postmodernism; state; trust; transformation; crisis

References


Bystrytsky E. (1996) State formation: ways of legitimation in Editor1.Derhachov O. (Ed. ), Ukrainian statehood in the twentieth century:historical and political analysis, Political thought, Kyiv, p. 320–348.

Kenning P. (2003) Power in Editor Taylor V., Winquist C.E. (Ed. ),2.Encyclopedia of Postmodernism, «Fundamentals», 503 p.

Maksimov C. (2008) Features of legitimation of political and legal3.relations in the process of modernization of the political system in Editor Gerasina L., Danilyana O. (Ed. ), Problems of modernization of political problems of today, «Pravо», Kharkiv, 318 p.

Heyden P. (2003) Authority in Editor Taylor V., Winquist C.E. (Ed. ),4.Encyclopedia of Postmodernism, «Fundamentals», 503 p.

Barskiy R. (2003) Postmodernity in Editor Taylor V., Winquist C.E.5.(Ed. ), Encyclopedia of Postmodernism, «Fundamentals», 503 p.

Irkhin U. (2005) Society and politics in the postmodern Mirror: views,6.approaches, analysis, Journal Politiya, vol. 4, available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsium-i-politika-v-postmodernistskom-zazerkalie-vzglyady-podhody-analiz (accessed 20 December 2019)

Lyotard J.-F. (1979) The postmodern condition: Report on the savoir,7.Aleteyya, Kyiv, 160 p.

Dogan M. (1994) The legitimacy of regimes and the crisis of confi8.dence // Sociological Research, vol. 6, available at: http://ecsoc-man.hse.ru/data/321/468/1217/018_dogman. pdf (accessed 20 December 2019)

Wilson B. (2003) Warhol, Andy and Editor Taylor V., Winquist C.E.9.(Ed.), Encyclopedia of Postmodernism, «Fundamentals», 503 p.

Zasiyaeva A. (2013) Legitimacy as a necessary element of democracy10.vol. 2, available at: https://mgimo.ru/upload/iblock/2ce/2ce7daccec9ee15b77cea343aa0f8127.pdf (accessed 20 December 2019)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026