RUSSIAN POLICY OF GENOCIDE THROUGH DEPORTATION OF PEOPLES: SYSTEMICITY AND PERMANENCE OF REPRESSION
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2020.84.49-71
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of one of the forms of genocide policy, namely — the crime of deportation, which was practiced by the Russian state throughout its existence. The political significance of the deportations was to curb the resistance of the tamed peoples, to prevent the real or potential threat of anti-Russian movements. Russia, as the successor to the USSR, did not assume political, legal and moral responsibility for the repression, the process of rehabilitation of deported peoples was stopped completely.
At the time of the collapse of the USSR, the leadership of the RSFSR tried to take certain steps in this direction, but with the proclamation of the Russian Federation as the successor to the union state, such efforts were completely stopped. In the current conditions in Russia there is no political, legal and moral assessment of crimes, no objective assessment of the causes and consequences of mass repression, rehabilitation of deported peoples committed in part or not at all, a number of regulations of the Soviet period to restrict rights and freedoms procedural use, etc. Moreover, the aggressive actions of modern Russia against independent states, including Moldova, Georgia, Syria, Libya, and especially Ukraine, have been a determining factor in new waves of forced migration of large populations, accompanied by significant human, moral, and material losses. All this imposes a special responsibility on the world community to carry out actions of various ranks (political, legal, economic, etc. ) to deter the criminal actions of the aggressor country and to develop the necessary conditions and requirements for the inevitability of punishment for crimes committed by the Putin regime.
Keywords
Full Text:
>PDF (Українська)
References
Konkvest R. (1993). Zhnyva skorboty: Radianska kolektyvizatsiia iholodomor / Per. z anhl. Kyiv: Lybid, 384 s.[in Ukrainian].
Nekrich A. (1978). Nakazannyye narody. Nyu York: «Khronika». 173 s.
Syniak D. Pro shcho soromiazlyvo movchat skrepy «pobiedobesiia»: yak chukchi pivtora stolittia buly «neperemozhni» /fakeoff.org/uk/history/pro-scho-soromyazlyvo (13 serpnia 2019 r.) [in Ukrainian].
Stryzhak O.S. (2001). Do etnohenezu ta etnomovnoi istorii kubantsiv-chornomortsiv. Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal. Vol 1. S. 93-106.
Arzhiniyazova A.K. (2007). Territoriya rasseleniya i chislennost nogaytsev Severnogo Kavkaza v kontse XVIII – seredine XIX v. Istoricheskaya isotsialno-obrazovatelnaya mysl. T. 9. № 6/2. S. 53–58.
Ediyev D.M. (2003). Demograficheskiye poteri deportirovannykh narodov SSSR. Stavropol: Izd-vo StGAU «AGRUCh»;Stavropolservisshkola. 336 s. [in Russian].
Gurianov A.E. Masshtaby deportatsii naseleniya v glub SSSR v maye-iyune 1941 g. / old.memo.ru/history/policy/g_2.htm.
Ochirova N.G. (2013). Nasilstvennoye pereseleniye kalmytskogo naroda i problemy demografii. Vestnik Kalmytskogo institutagumanitarnykh issledovaniy RAN. Vol. 3. S. 40–45.
Serhiichuk V.I. (2001). Ukrainskyi Krym. Kyiv: Ukrainska Vydavnycha spilka. 304 s. [in Ukrainian].
Ediyev D.M. (2003). Demograficheskiye poteri deportirovannykh narodov SSSR. Stavropol: Izd-vo StGAU «AGRUCh»;Stavropolservisshkola. 336 s. [in Russian].
Chebykina T. Deportatsiya nemetskogo naseleniya iz evropeyskoy chasti SSSR v Zapadnuyu Sibir (1941 – 1945 gg.) / old.memo.ru/history/nem/chapter14.htm.
Goncharov G.A. (2012). «Trudmobilizovannyy» kontingent ispravitelno-trudovykh lagerey Urala v gody Velikoy Otechestvennoyvoyny. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universisteta.Vol.25 (279). Istoriya. Vyp. 52. S. 75–81.
Shtoidel N., Hrabska A. Pamiat pro deportatsiiu nimtsiv: nazad na novu batkivshchynu / dw.com/uk/a 17345385 (18.01.2014).
Bilinskyi V.B. (2011). Moskva Ordynska (XIII – XVI stolittia): Istorychne doslidzhennia. K.: Vydavnytstvo imeni Oleny Telihy, 304s.[in Ukrainian].
Slisarenko O.M. (2018). Ukrainske kozatstvo na budivnytstvi Ladozkoho kanalu. Naukovo-teoretychnyi almanakh «Hrani». T. 21.№ 9. S. 105–110.
Shtepa P. (2005). Moskovstvo: yoho pokhodzhennia, zmist, formy y istorychna tiahlist: Vydannia piate. Drohobych: Vyd. firma«Vidrodzhennia», 412 s. [in Ukrainian].
Skliar V.M. (2008). Etnichnyi sklad naselennia Ukrainy 1959 – 1989 rr.: etnomovni naslidky zrosiishchennia. Kyiv: «Prosvita», 392 s. [inUkrainian].
Misnik L. «Loshadey prishlos brosit»: kak tsygan vyselyali iz Moskvy/ gazeta.ru/social/2018/06/27/11816557.shtml (28.06.2018).
Harin I. Yak v SRSR hotuvalys znyshchyty yevreiv / nv.ua/urr/opinion/yak-v-srsr-gotuvalisya-znishchuvati-yevreyiv-89009.html.
Polyan P.M. (2001). Ne po svoyey vole… Istoriya i geografiya prinuditelnykh migratsiy. M.: Izd-vo «OGI-Memorial». 329 s. [inRussian].
O reabilitatsii repressirovannykh narodov: Zakon RSFSR ot 26 aprelya 1991 g. № 1107-I / base.garant.ru/102000365.
O reabilitatsii zhertv politicheskikh repressiy: Zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18 oktyabrya 1991 g. № 1761-1 / consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_1619.
O merakh po reabilitatsii armyanskogo. bolgarskogo. grecheskogo. krymsko-tatarskogo i nemetskogo narodov i gosudarstvennoypodderzhke ikh vozrozhdeniya i razvitiya: Ukaz Prezidenta RossiyskoyFederatsii ot 21 aprelya 2014 g. № 268 / sevkrimrus.narod.ru/ZAKON/2014tatar.htm.
Mikhaylova N.V. (2015). Savina L.M. Krymskiye tatary: deportatsiya i reabilitatsiya. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii.Yuridicheskiye nauki. Vol. 1. S. 32–37.
V svyazi s 26 godovshchinoy prinyatiya zakona RSFSR «O reabilitatsii repressirovannykh narodov»: Zayavleniye Byuro partii «Yabloko» ot27 aprelya 2017 / yabloko.ru/Resheniya_Byuro/2017/04/27.
Gunayev E.A. (2013). Tsennost pravovogo gosudarstva i prav cheloveka – konstitutsionnyy imperativ pri issledovanii istoriirepressiy narodov v SSSR v 30 – 50-e gg. v XX v. Vestnik Kalmytskogoinstituta gumanitarnykh issledovaniy RAN.Vol. 3. S. 136–140.
Garin I.I. (2020). Chelovek: dukhovnost i telesnost. Kharkov: Folio. 943 s. [in Ukrainian].
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026






