INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AS A TOOL OF INFORMATION OPERATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF RUSSIA’S HYBRID AGGRESSION AGAINST UKRAINE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2026.100.2.261-280
Abstract
This article examines the phenomenon of intellectual property rights violations as an instrument of information influence in the context of the Russian Federation’s hybrid aggression against Ukraine. The study demonstrates that in the digital environment, intellectual property rights are transforming from a mechanism of legal protection into a tool for controlling information flows that can be instrumentalized for purposes of information influence. The concept of normative asymmetry is introduced and defined as the selective application and instrumentalization of legal norms in accordance with political and strategic interests, thereby creating conditions for the systematic use of intellectual property rights violations.
Based on the analysis of selected case studies (including Russian Government Resolution No. 299, the institutionalization of film piracy, the “Doppelganger” information operation, deepfake technologies, the use of TikTok, and the transformation of Ukrainian musical content), the study reveals the multi-level nature of these practices – from institutional and regulatory dimensions to technological and cultural-symbolic levels. It is shown that intellectual property rights violations enable the creation, modification, and large-scale dissemination of manipulative content, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of information influence.
The findings indicate that such practices have significant implications for national security, including the erosion of trust in the information environment and state institutions, manipulation of public opinion and political processes, distortion of reality perception, psychological destabilization of society, as well as cultural expansion and the erosion of national identity.
The study concludes that intellectual property rights violations should be understood not only as a legal issue but as a systemic instrument of information influence and a factor of national security. Future research should focus on the role of digital platforms, algorithmic systems, and artificial intelligence in the dissemination of manipulative content, as well as on the development of effective countermeasures to mitigate these threats.
Keywords
Full Text:
>PDF (Українська)
References
Buriachenko, O. (2024). Hibridna viina yak nova forma hlobalnoho protystoiannia [Hybrid war as a new form of global confrontation]. [in Ukrainian]. Scientific Works of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Political Sciences and Public Management, (2(74)), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2024-2(74)-3
Zimenko, O. (2021). Informatsiinyi vplyv: poniattia ta evoliutsiia v suchasnii naukovii dumtsi [Informational influence: concept and evolution in modern scientific thought]. [in Ukrainian]. Visnyk of Kharkiv State Academy of Culture, (60), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5333.060.02
WIPO. (1979). Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. https://www.wipo.int/en/web/treaties/ip/berne/index
WIPO. (1996). WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT). https://www.wipo.int/en/web/treaties/ip/wct/index
Rosenberg, S. (2023, September 28). How Russians stand in lines to watch pirated "Barbie". BBC News Україна. https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/articles/cxx6kx88yzro
DFRLab. (2023b). Undermining Ukraine: How the Kremlin employs information operations to erode global confidence in Ukraine. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/undermining-ukraine/
Doppelganger Hub. EU DisInfoLab. URL: https://www.disinfo.eu/doppelganger-hub
Osadchuk, R. (2025). Rosiiski dezinformatsiini operatsii proty Ukrainy pid chas shyrokomasshtabnoho vtorhnennia: keis-stadi [Russian disinformation operations against Ukraine during the large-scale invasion: a case study]. [in Ukrainian]. Synopsis: Text, Context, Media, 31(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2025.3.10
DFRLab. Undermining Ukraine: How the Kremlin Employs Information Operations to Erode Global Confidence in Ukraine. Washington : Atlantic Council, 2023. 44 с. URL: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/undermining-ukraine/
O'Connor C. How to Investigate TikTok Like a Pro - Part II: Using TikTok for Ukraine Research. Bellingcat. URL: https://www.bellingcat.com/resources/how-tos/2022/11/02/how-to-investigate-tiktok-using-tiktok-ukraine-research/
Chesney, B., & Citron, D. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107(6), 1753–1820. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3213954
Gillespie, T. (2020). Content moderation, AI, and the question of scale. Big Data & Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720943234
Bösch, M., & Divon, T. (2024). The sound of disinformation: TikTok, computational propaganda, and the invasion of Ukraine. New Media & Society, 26(9), 5081–5106. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241251804
DFRLab. (2024, February 29). Undermining Ukraine: How Russia widened its global information war in 2023. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/undermining-ukraine-how-russia-widened-its-global-information-war-in-2023/#all-chapters
UANIPIO. (2024, January 15). How to protect ukrainian intellectual property from russia: The case of Khrystyna Soloviy’s song. [in Ukrainian]. https://nipo.gov.ua/keis-pisni-khrystyny-solovii/
UANIPIO. (2025, February 27). Russia used Zlata Ognevich’s song: What to do in such cases to protect copyright. [in Ukrainian]. https://nipo.gov.ua/vkraly-pisniu-shcho-robyty/
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026






