ART AS A GENERATOR OF WORLD-VIEWING PATTERNS
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2026.100.2.117-130
Abstract
The article presents a comprehensive philosophical analysis of art as a generator of worldview models and one of the key mechanisms for shaping semantic, axiological, and behavioral orientations of society. It is substantiated that art performs not only aesthetic and communicative functions but also acts as a powerful instrument of ideological influence, symbolic demarcation, and worldview construction of social reality. It is proved that even in the absence of direct authorial intention, a work of art inevitably forms a system of value coordinates, stimulates reconsideration of established meanings, and encourages individual worldview self-identification.
Special attention is paid to the symbolic nature of art and to the mechanisms of functioning of the artistic image as a means of transmitting cultural codes, mental attitudes, and sociocultural mythologies. The interrelation between art, symbol, mentality, and myth is analyzed, and the specificity of their influence on the formation of collective worldview perception is revealed. Based on the analysis of the works of Raphael, Leonardo da Vinci, Pablo Picasso, Vincent van Gogh, and other artists, it is demonstrated that the interpretation of artistic works largely depends on historical, cultural, and axiological contexts.
Particular emphasis is placed on the argument that art and morality constitute two autonomous yet interconnected spiritual domains whose interaction determines the boundaries of creative freedom, social responsibility, and the value orientation of artistic activity. It is concluded that art functions not only as a reflection of social processes but also as an active factor in the spiritual, cultural, and worldview transformation of both the individual and society.
Keywords
Full Text:
>PDF (Українська)
References
Kohut, O. V. (2025). Art as a socio-cultural phenomenon: content-functional challenges of the present. Culturological Almanac. No. 1, 207–214. [in Ukrainian]
Taine, H. (2017). The Philosophy of Art. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. 76 р.
Graham, G. (2005). Philosophy of the Arts: An Introduction to Aesthetics. Routledge. 288 р.
Bourdieu, P. & Darbel, A. (1966). L'amour de l'art: les musées d'art européens et leur public. Editions de Minuit. 251 р.
Carroll, N. (1999). Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge. 288 р.
Neill, A. & Ridley, A. (1994). The Philosophy of Art: Readings Ancient and Modern. McGraw-Hill Humanities. 592 р.
Cosgrove, D. (1998). Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. University of Wisconsin Press. 293 p.
Slyvinsky, A. (2024). Sociocultural interaction as a factor in the evolution of humanity. Higher Education of Ukraine. No. 2, 14–27.
Hidden Symbols of Still Live Paintings | Vanitas! URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUpwenYB5eE.
Kohut, O. (2025). The symbolic sphere as an ontological resource of art. Higher Education of Ukraine. No. 1, 100–106.
Dutch still lifes: symbolism of flowers, animals, fruits. Vanitas still life. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDTxR_H9ebk.
Symbolism in Frida Kahlo's art: What did she hide in her paintings? URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSfOs4Ke0l8.
Levkulych, V. V. (2018). Justice as a socio-cultural phenomenon: monograph / V. V. Levkulych. Uzhhorod: Helvetica Publishing House, 480 p.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Polity Press. 336 р.
Davymuka, S. (2021). The ecosystem of art: scientific principles of formation and modern practices: monograph / State Institution "Institute of Regional Studies named after M. I. Dolishnyi NAS of Ukraine". Lviv, 581 p.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026






