PHILOSOPHICAL-EDUCATIONAL DIMENSION OF AESTHETIC CULTURE IN THE PROFESSIONAL FORMATION OF FUTURE TEACHERS
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2026.100.2.103-116
Abstract
In a modern transitive society, characterized by rapid technologization, information oversaturation and the crisis of classical humanistic ideals, the problem of preserving spirituality is of extreme importance. In the conditions of cultural polyparadigmality and the challenges of postmodernism, it is aesthetic culture that acts as a reliable reference point capable of harmonizing human existence. This phenomenon acquires particular importance in the context of professional training of future teachers, who are direct translators of cultural values to the next generation.
The article analyzes modern philosophical approaches to understanding the nature of culture as a multi-level social phenomenon. It is proved that aesthetic culture is an organic component of the general culture of mankind, which structurally encompasses aesthetic consciousness, aesthetic activity and aesthetic education. The basic functions of aesthetic culture in pedagogical activity are identified and substantiated: worldview, axiological, cognitive, translational and spiritual-creative. The influence of the postmodern paradigm and mass culture on the transformation of classical aesthetic ideals is considered, which creates new challenges for the education system. It is proven that aesthetic culture is the fundamental basis of modern humanistic education and an integral attribute of the professional skills of a teacher. A high level of aesthetic development allows a teacher to transform scientific truth through emotional and sensory perception, to resist the destructive influences of pseudoculture and to act as a true architect of the spiritual world of youth.
Keywords
Full Text:
>PDF (Українська)
References
Andrushchenko, V. P. (2014). Poniattia kultury: filosofskyi dyskurs na rubezhi stolit. Visnyk Instytutu rozvytku dytyny. Seriia: Filosofiia, pedahohika, psykholohiia, (33), 5–9.
Dobrovolska, O. M. (2014). Fenomen kultury v istoryko-filosofskomu dyskursi epokhy. Nova paradyhma, (120), 74–85.
Ryzova, I. S. (2011). Kultura yak naibilsh fundamentalnyi sposib liudskoho buttia. Humanitarnyi visnyk Zaporizkoi derzhavnoi inzhenernoi akademii, (46), 126–134.
Voropaeva, V. H. (2012). Kultura yak predmet sotsialno-filosofskoho dyskursu. Humanitarnyi visnyk Zaporizkoi derzhavnoi inzhenernoi akademii, (51), 177–190.
Sukhodub, T. D. (2013). XX stolittia: dyskurs osmyslennia filosofii. Visnyk KNLU. Seriia: Istoriia, ekonomika, filosofiia, (18), 144–154.
Zaluzhna, A. (2015). Liudynovymirnist kultury u filosofskomu dyskursi “piznoho radianskoho marksyzmu”. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia: Kulturolohiia, (16), 307–309.
Vozniak, S. S., & Kostiuk, T. V. (2012). Kultura yak sotsialne yavyshche: aksiolohichnyi vymir. Sotsiolohichni studii, (1), 16–22.
Babii, L. (2009). Dukhovna kultura yak vazhlyvyi oriientyr rozvytku ukrainskoho suspilstva. In Etyko-aksiolohichni aspekty transformatsii suchasnoho ukrainskoho suspilstva (pp. 9–20). Ivano-Frankivsk: Vydavets I. Ya. Tretiak.
Artemenko, A. (2010). Tsinnist “zrizanoho yakoria” ta tekhnolohizatsiia kultury. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia: Filosofiia, (7), 237–242.
Lubska, V. V. (2014). Vymir kulturnoi vesternizatsii v Ukraini. Problemy mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn, (8), 72–81.
Maksymeniuk, M. Yu. (2010). Sotsialno-filosofskyi dyskurs rozvytku polietnichnoho sotsiumu. Humanitarnyi visnyk Zaporizkoi derzhavnoi inzhenernoi akademii, (40), 224–238.
Suliatytska, T. (2011). Kulturni tsinnosti ta yikh mistse v mizhkulturnii komunikatsii. Kulturolohichna dumka, (3), 185–189.
Chmil, H. (2015). Filosofskyi dyskurs kinoekrannoi realnosti. Kulturolohichna dumka, (8), 19–25.
Sviatnenko, I. O. (2015). Henderna kultura yak sotsiolohichnyi kontsept: do postanovky problemy. Hrani, 10/1(126), 103–108.
Kolesinkov, M. P., Kolesnikova, O. V., Lozovyi, V. O., et al. (2007). Estetyka (V. O. Lozovyi, Ed.). Yurinkom Inter.
Lozovyi, V. O. (Ed.). (2007). Morfolohiia kultury: tezaurus. Pravo.
Rashydova, N. M. (2017). Rol estetychnoi kultury u formuvanni osobystosti. Dukhovnist osobystosti: metodolohiia, teoriia i praktyka, (2), 232–238.
Chubareva, O. O. (2016). Estetychne v zhytti suchasnoho suspilstva i liudyny. Humanitarnyi visnyk Zaporizkoi derzhavnoi inzhenernoi akademii, (65), 67–75.
Mokliak, L. I. (2012). Sotsiokulturni funktsii estetychnoi kultury v umovakh transformatsii suchasnoho ukrainskoho suspilstva. Visnyk NAU. Seriia: Filosofiia. Kulturolohiia, 16(2), 92–96.
Romanova, A. S. (2015). Dukhovno-estetychnyi aspekt profesiinoho buttia yurysta: intelihibelne ta sensybelne osmyslennia. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”. Yurydychni nauky, (827), 193–199.
Yakovenko, M. L. (2012). Transformatsii estetychnoho v tradytsii postmodernizmu. Humanitarnyi visnyk Zaporizkoi derzhavnoi inzhenernoi akademii, (49), 88–95.
Lychkovakh, V. (1999). Pryntsypy (post)modernoho mystetstva. Mandrivets, (3), 31–33.
Derkach, Yu. (2012). Metodolohichni aspekty estetychnoho vykhovannia studentiv u navchalno-vykhovnomu seredovyshchi pedahohichnoho koledzhu. Molod i rynok, (11), 120–124.
Pelesok, Yu. (2012). Problema formuvannia “estetychnoi kultury” osobystosti dytyny zasobamy mystetstva u tvorchii spadshchyni Yakova Andriiovycha Mamontova (1888–1940). Psykholoho-pedahohichni problemy silskoi shkoly, 42(1), 301–305.
Zaitseva, O. (2012). Urok muzyky yak osnovnyi zasib formuvannia estetychnoi kultury uchniv osnovnoi shkoly. Problemy pidhotovky suchasnoho vchytelia, 6(2), 203–208.
Kryvosheia, N. (2014). Rozvytok muzychno-estetychnoi kultury starshykh doshkilnykiv zasobamy muzychnoi kazky. Psykholoho-pedahohichni problemy silskoi shkoly, (48), 217–222.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026






