IDENTITY AS A PHENOMENON OF THE POSTMODERN AGE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2019.83.60-70
Abstract
This article has analyzed the influence of postmodern practices on the development and functioning of nation states, their culture and identity. It is shown that postmodernism is largely determined by the processes of globalization as the current defining civilizational progress, the content of which is the growing interconnection and interdependence of national economies, political and socio-cultural systems, as well as the identity of universalistic practices of regulating the activity of subjects of world-system relations in different spheres of being.
It was found that one of the problematic consequences of postmodernism is the radical transformation of traditional structures and principles of self-identification, both collective and personal wherever they happen, and whatever the institutional, cultural layers of society and patterns of behavior affect people. Close coexistence and even interpenetration of completely different, sometimes mutually exclusive, and sometimes simply disjointed value scales lead to total relativization of everything and everybody when even personal and collective identities lose the quality of metaphysical constants and are perceived as an unfinished project. That is why a person of the postmodern age is deprived of self-certainty. Therefore, there is a great need to rethink the content and consequences of postmodern practices of blurring traditional identities and the emergence of new ones, the role of the state in preserving and protecting the values, contents, ideals, cultural models and language that shape and reproduce the nation.
It is concluded that in post-totalitarian states of the European space (including Ukraine), processes of globalization and post-modern practices create two opposite tendencies. On the one hand, globalization unifies, internalizes and westernizes all aspects of society. On the other hand, in the way of bringing the elements of modern democracy into the life of the post-totalitarian state, globalization stimulates the processes of cultural and spiritual revival and the desire to form the collective «We», affirm its identity and individuality through consolidation around a common history, language, culture, values and orientations, life strategies. In Ukraine, it is also a consolidation of the efforts of all its citizens to repel Russian aggression, protect the sovereignty and independence of the state, integrate into European and Euro-Atlantic structures, achieve well-being for all citizens. Ukraine, as the newest unfinished civilization project, has all prospectives of avoiding the pitfalls of both «melting pot» and multiculturalism, as well as postmodern problems, since most of them have not yet attained a broad realization in its territory.
Keywords
Full Text:
>PDF (Українська)
References
Bogomolov A. V., Danilov S. I., Semivolos I. N., Yavorskaya G. M., Islamskaya K. (2006). Identichnost v Ukraine [Identity in Ukraine]. Publishing house «Stilos». [in Russian].
E. A. Afonina, Maffasoli M. (2018). Chas plemen. Zanepad indyvidualizmu v postmodernomu suspilstvi Ukraine [The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society]. Kyiv: Kyievo-Mohyl. academy. 2018. p. 264. [in Ukrainian].
Bauman Z., V.L. Inozemtsev. (2002). Individualizovannoe obshchestvo [Individual society]. Tsentr issledovaniy postindustrialnogo obshchestva [the Center for Post-Industrial Society Studies]. M.: Logos. [in Russian].
Khalapsis A. (2008). Postneklassicheskaya metafizika istorii: Monografiya. [Post- nonclassical metaphysics of history: Monograph]. Dnepropetrovsk: Publishing house «Innovatsiya». [in Russian].
Fukuyama, F. (2007). Konets istorii i posledniy chelovek [The End of History and the Last Man]. M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: «KhRANITYeL». [in Russian].
Tramp D. Ya natsіonalіst. Vikoristovuyte tse slovo. [I am a nationalist. Use that word]. — Available at: https://www. ar25.org/article/donald-tramp-ya-nacionalist-vykorystovuyte-ce-slovo. html. [in Ukrainian].
Knabe H., H. S. Knabeiu., (2003) Zhazhda tozhdestva: kulturno antropolohycheskaia ydentyfykatsyia. Vchera. Sehodnia. Zavtra. [Сraving for identity: culturally anthropological identification. Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow]. [in Russian].
Zamyatin. Ye. (2008). «My» [We]. Moskva: AST. p. 260. [in Russian].
Bekhterev V. (1921). Kollektivnaya refleksologiya [Collective reflexology]. Pg.: Kolos, p. 432. [in Russian].
Lebon H., F. (1986) Psikhologiya narodov i mass [Psychology of nations and masses]. Pavlenko publishing house. p. 329. [in Russian].
Freyd Z. (1991) Massovaya psikhologiya i analiz chelovecheskogo «Ya». «Ya» i «Ono»: Trudy raznykh let [Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. «I» and «It»: papers of different ages]. Tbilisi: Merani, Book 1. p. 71–138. [in Russian].
Fromm E. (1989). Begstvo ot svobody [Escape from freedom]. M.: Progress. p. 272. [in Russian].
Hibernau M. (2012). Identychnist natsii [The Identity of Nations]. Kyiv: Tempora. [in Ukrainian].
I. S. Vdovinoy, S.P. Fokina, M. Merlo-Ponti. (1999). Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya [Phenomenology of Perception]. SPb. [in Russian].
Ukrainske suspilstvo [Ukrainian society] (2018): Monitorynh sotsialnykh zmin [Monitoring social change]. National academy of science of Ukraine. Issue 5 (19). K., IS. [in Ukrainian].
Osoblyvosti identychnosti hromadian Ukrainy: problemy ta perspektyvy konsolidatsii suspilstva [Identity features of Ukrainian citizens, problems and prospects for consolidation of society]. — Available: http://razumkov.org.ua/upload/Identi-2016.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
«Zahlushky» i dotatsii TB: u MIP rozghliadaiut try stratehii shchodo okupovanoho Donbasu [«Stubs» and TV subsidies: The Ministry of Information Policy of Ukraine examines three strategies for occupied Donbas]. –Available at: https://www.5.ua/suspilstvo/zahlushky-i-dotatsii-tb-u-mip-rozghliadaiut-try-stratehii-shchodo-okupovanoho-donbasu-151379.html. [in Ukrainian].
Meshkantsi pidkontrolnoi ukrainskomu uriadu chastyny Donbasu vtrychi chastishe staly identyfikuvaty sebe yak etnichni ukraintsi, u porivnianni z 2016 rokom. [Residents of the Donbas-controlled part of the Ukrainian government have three times more likely to identify themselves as ethnic Ukrainians, compared to 2016]. –Available at: https://sprotyv.info/news/identichnist-donbasu-tretina-zhiteliv-donechchini-vvazhajut-sebe-ukraincyami. [in Ukrainian].
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026






