SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPLES OF CREATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2025.97.39-50

Vitalii Shkafer

Abstract


This article provides a social and philosophical analysis of the fundamentals of creative entrepreneurship. Drawing on the ideas of J. Schumpeter, M. Weber, J. Hawkins, R. Florida and D. Trosby, it conceptualises creative entrepreneurship as a value-laden synthesis of economic innovation and cultural significance. It provides an overview of four paradigms: the UK's DCMS model, UNESCO's Creative Cities Network, the EU's Creative Europe programme, and South Korea's Creative Economy Plan. The evolution of entrepreneurship from industrial production to post-industrial, creative models is traced, showing how each paradigm embeds creativity into distinct institutional logics (intellectual property urbanism, multilateral cultural governance, financial integration, and technology-driven innovation). It is argued that successful implementation depends on a balance between individual profit motives and collective cultural values, which is often disrupted by the high fixed cost/low marginal cost structure of cultural goods. The strategic role of creative entrepreneurship in the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine is emphasised, where, by combining intellectual property protection and mixed sources of funding, it will be possible to move from outsourcing services to creating competitive cultural products.

Keywords


creative entrepreneurship; creative economy; value; creativity; socio-philosophical dimension; creativity

References


Galakhova, T.O. (2014). Creative industry: theoretical and methodological approaches study. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series «Economic Sciences», 9(4), 9-13.

Kopiika, D. V. (2018). Structural dynamics of the creative sector of global economy. Strategy for the Development of Ukraine, 2, 148-152.

Schumpeter, J. A. (2003). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London &New York: Routledge.

Weber, M. (2002). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.

Howkins, J. (2013). The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas. London: Penguin.

Florida, R. (2019). The Rise of the Creative Class – And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.

Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). (1998). Creative Industries Mapping Document. London: HMSO. URL:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industries-mapping-documents-1998

UNESCO. UNESCO Creative Cities Network – Mission and Vision. Paris: UNESCO (2023). URL: https://www.unesco.org/en/creative-cities

European Commission. Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2014–2020). Brussels, (2013). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R1295

Connell, S. (2013). Building a Creative Economy in South Korea: Analyzing the Plans and Possibilities for New Economic Growth. Academic Paper Series (Korea Economic Institute of America), 10. https://www.keia.org/sites/default/files/publications/kei_creative_economy.pdf

Sand, S. A. (2020). Creative Clusters – Urban Utopia or Regional Remedy? A Nordic Perspective on the Role of the Creative Industries in Regional Development. Nordic Journal of Cultural Policy, 23 (2), 103-122.

Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). The Cultural Industries. 3rd ed. London: Sage.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026