SELF-GOVERNANCE AS A CORRELATE OF DEMOCRACY


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2025.96.192-204

Andriі Matviichuk

Abstract


The article provides a systematic analysis of the concept of self-governance in the context of contemporary democratic theory. It identifies the features of democratic self-governance and examines related theories, including localism, decentralization of power, political autonomy, and the principle of subsidiarity. The study demonstrates how the development of self-governance influences the level of democracy in a society.
Self-governance is explored as a political institution that ensures the implementation of popular sovereignty, legitimization of power, and contributes to the development of active civic participation and a democratic political culture. Drawing on the theoretical contributions of J.-J. Rousseau, J. Locke, J. Habermas, J. Cohen, A. Gutmann, and others, the article argues that self-governance functions not only as administrative decentralization but also as a mechanism of public participation that promotes transparency, accountability, and the legitimacy of democratic governance.
Particular attention is given to the theory of subsidiarity and the concept of multilevel governance, which have gained special relevance in the context of European integration. The study finds that the effectiveness of self-governing practices is closely linked to the level of political culture, civic competence, and institutional capacity. A comparative analysis of self-governance practices and democracy indices across different countries is conducted. The article critically examines the challenges facing local self-governance, including populism, clientelism, and insufficient resource autonomy.
It is concluded that self-governance in a democratic state is not a peripheral element but a key correlate of democracy, ensuring the sustainable development of democratic institutions and political participation.


Keywords


self-governance; democracy; political participation; political decentralization; legitimacy; public authority

References


Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1997). Law of Ukraine “On Local Self-Government in Ukraine” No. 280/97-VR of May 21, 1997 (latest version). Kyiv: Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/280/97-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text

Mill, J. S. (1861). Considerations on Representative Government. London: Parker, Son, and Bourn. 305 p.

Tocqueville, A. de. (1835). Democracy in America (Vol. 1). London: Saunders and Otley. 460 p.

Bookchin, M. (1987). The Rise of Urbanization and the Decline of Citizenship. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books. 272 p.

Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 569 p.

Madison, J., Hamilton, A., & Jay, J. (1788). The Federalist Papers. (Edited by C. Rossiter, 1961). New York: New American Library. 688 p.

Stepan, A. (1999). Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model. Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19–34.

Pius XI. (1931). Quadragesimo Anno: Encyclical on Reconstruction of the Social Order. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 50 p.

European Union. (1992). Treaty on European Union (Maastricht Treaty). Maastricht: European Union Publications. Official Journal, 191 р.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1996). Constitution of Ukraine. Kyiv: Parliamentary Publishing House. 63 р.

Council of Europe. (1985). European Charter of Local Self-Government. Ratified by the Law of Ukraine No. 452/97-VR of July 15, 1997. Kyiv: Parliamentary Publishing House.

The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2024). Democracy Index 2023: Age of Conflict. London: EIU. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com

OECD. (2022). Trust in Government: Evidence and Implications. Paris: OECD Publishing. 126 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/7cd5efc3-en

European Union. (2012). Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C326/13, Article 5.

Council of Europe. (2021). Local Democracy in Ukraine. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. 92 p.

Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press. 397 p.

The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2023). Democracy Index 2022: Frontline Democracy and the Battle for Freedom. London: EIU. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022/

Ladner, A., Keuffer, N., & Baldersheim, H. (2019). Measuring Local Autonomy in 39 Countries (1990–2014). Regional & Federal Studies, 29(3), 321–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2019.1612641

World Bank. (2022). Worldwide Governance Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/

Council of Europe. (2023). Local and Regional Democracy in Ukraine: Monitoring Report. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. 102 p.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026