CREATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP AS A PHENOMENON OF MODERN BUSINESS PHILOSOPHY
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2025.94.58-69
Abstract
This article explores creative entrepreneurship as a phenomenon of growing significance amid the transformations of contemporary post-industrial society. The study examines the specific features of this concept through the lens of business philosophy, allowing it to be understood not only as an economic category but also as a sociocultural one. The conceptual foundations of the research are based on the ideas of J. Schumpeter (the concept of "creative destruction"), J. Dewey (the pragmatic approach to education and adaptability), and R. Rorty (the notion of contingency and critical reflection in the face of uncertainty). It is demonstrated that the modern creative entrepreneur is not merely a bearer of economic knowledge, but an individual with a high level of emotional intelligence, capable of interdisciplinary thinking and generating new meanings. A philosophical analysis is conducted of the interaction between creativity, innovation, and the ethical dimensions of entrepreneurial activity. The study reveals that creative entrepreneurship acts as a driver of social change and contributes to the formation of new values. It is concluded that its development enhances the competitiveness not only of individual entrepreneurs but also of the national economy as a whole.
The methodological relevance of business philosophy in shaping the theoretical foundations of the study is emphasised. Contemporary approaches to understanding entrepreneurship are analysed through a multidimensional framework encompassing economic, philosophical, psychological and managerial dimensions. The article highlights that creative entrepreneurship emerges in synergy with cultural habits and global value shifts, serving not merely as a response to market demands but also as a transformative force. It is argued that the innovative potential of the individual, supported by philosophical insight and emotional intelligence, is crucial for sustainable progress. The study outlines directions for further research, including the impact of digital culture on the evolution of entrepreneurial thinking and the development of educational models aimed at cultivating qualified, critically minded and socially responsible entrepreneurs of a new generation.
Keywords
Full Text:
>PDF (Українська)
References
Pryiatel'chuk, A. O. (2012). The structure of the philosophy of economics. Humanities Bulletin of Zaporizhzhe State Engineering Academy, (48), 70–78.
Hlushko, T. (2022). Philosophy of business as an interdisciplinary educational component. Philosophy of education, 28 (1), 184–196.
Shumpeter, Y. A. (1995). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (V. Ruzhyts'kyi & P. Tarashchuk, Trans.). Osnovy.
Pashchenko, O. P. (2017). Creative management as a factor of success of modern business. Global and National Problems of Economy, 17, 406–410.
Saukh, I., Saukh, P., & Solodovnyk, A. (2024). Creativity as a key competence and an integral result of the quality of the management process in the educational sphere. Ukrainian Educational Journal., (2), 90–103.
Dewey, J. (2001). Democracy and Education. A Penn State Electronic Classics Series Publication. Retrieved from https://nsee.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/KnowledgeCenter/BuildingExpEduc/BooksReports/10.%20democracy%20and%20education%20by%20dewey.pdf
Solianyk, S. F. (2024). Creativity as an important quality of a modern personality. Educational Discours, 49 (4–6), 59–67.
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43 (7), 1097–1108.
Prystai, O. (2022). Creativity and emotional intelligence in the structure of managerial competence of the head of educational institutions. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Psychology, 1 (15), 36–41.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press, 201 р.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026






