PROPAGANDA OVER PLACES’ NAMES AS A TOOL TO PROMOTE CONFLICT ABSTRACT

Abstract

Objective of the study: To research the long-running tensions between Greece and Turkey under the prism of contemporary propaganda which through the impact of toponymic nationalism on territorial disputes, is used as a tool to promote or to prelude conflict. To demonstrate that how geographical names are used by political leaders and ingrained in propaganda contribute to the creation of national identities by using the sense of ownership, and the arousal of conflict.
Methodology: Historical and modern claims have been deployed to form the foundation of the theoretical basis. Emphasis is given to the role played by political figures in influencing place names to support patriotic feelings and boost territorial claims. A distinction is made on how propaganda may incite conflict and thwart peaceful coexistence between nations. Although these actions can increase internal support for policy goals, they also run the danger of exacerbating tensions and impeding diplomatic efforts to find a solution.
Results and Conclusions: To prevent possible conflicts from igniting or historical conflicts from re-igniting, the transmission of factual information and conduct of responsible approach towards geopolitically sensitive places poses a necessity in order to promote peaceful diplomacy. The study’s suggestion is to develop policies that would lessen territorial conflicts and promote peaceful cohabitation.