THE PROCESS OF SINICIZATION OF MARXISM: LI JUNJU’S THEORETICAL RECONSTRUCTION FEATURES


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2023.90.145-163

Vyacheslav Vilkov

Abstract


The attributive characteristics of the conceptual approach, which forms one of the dominant ideational and political-ideological trends in Chinese historical-philosophical and social science discourses and provides justification for the narrative that the axis of development of Marxist thought in China during the 1930s–2010s was a gradual process of its Sinicization, are analyzed and revealed based on the study of publications by representatives of the Chinese community of philosophers and social scientists as well as the provisions of the CPC’s basic program documents. The philosophical-methodological, socio-political, and ideological features of such a nationalized version of the Marxist theoretical model, which received the name «Sinicized Marxism («Marxism with Chinese characteristics») in modern literature, have been revealed and characterized by means of a theoretical comparison of ideas from various and sometimes alternative interpretations by Chinese scientists of the history and logic of the relationship between the Western, Soviet (Marxism-Leninism) and Chinese Marxism and, above all, through a thorough analysis of the theoretical reconstruction, done by Li Junju, of the essence, stages and defining tendencies of the purposeful and initiated by the leaders of the CPC adaptation of axiomatics and the political and ideological component of the Marxist teaching to the conditions and tasks of national-state and socialist construction in the PRC. It was the system of his socio-political and ideological prescriptions and values that formed the theoretical foundation of the strategic doctrine of the Communist Party of China — «building socialism with Chinese characteristics».

Keywords


Marxism-Leninism; Chinese Marxism; Sinicization of Marxism; Sinicized Marxism; CPSU; CPC; Socialism with Chinese Characteristics; Li Junju

References


Constitution of the Communist Party of China. General Program. (2017). — URL: http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/download/Constitution_of_the_Communist_Party_of_China. pdf [In English].

Full Text of the CPC Constitution, adopted with partial amendments by the 19th CPC National Congress. (2017). URL: http://russian.news.cn/2017–11/03/c_136726536.htm [In Russian].

Li, Junju. (2017). On the main questions of the sinicization of Marxism. URL: http://svom.info/entry/759-ob-osnovnyh-voprosah-kitaizaciimarksizma/ [In Russian].

Program of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Chrestomathy on the history of the CPSU. In 2 volumes. Moscow: Politizdat, Vol. 2, 499–607 [In Russian].

Sun, Weiping. (2017). Marxist Philosophy in Modern China. State and Trends of Research. URL: http://svom. info/entry/761-marksistskaya-filosofiya-v-sovremennom-kitae-sosto/ [In Russian].

Zhang Shuhua. (2017). Leninism — a brilliant example of the russification of Marxism. URL: http://svom.info/entry/753-leninizmblestyashij-obrazec-rusifikacii-marksizma/ [In Russian].

Vilkov, V. (2020). The Phenomenon of Soviet Philosophy: Paradigmatic Approaches to Theoretical Reconstructions in Historical and Philosophical Studies in Post-Soviet Ukraine and Heuristic Ideological and Theoretical Prescriptions of its Research. The scientific heritage, no. 46, vol. 5, 46–59. [In Ukrainian].

Vilkov, V. (2022). Modernization of Marxism in Modern China: Alternative Philosophical and Social Studies Interpretations. / Ukrainian Policymaker, vol. 10, 69–84. — URL: http://www.ukrpolitic.com/journals/2022/10/UP_vol_10_Vilkov. pdf [In English].

Vilkov, V. (2022) The attributes of Marxist-Leninist philosophy in the USSR: paradigmatic narratives in post-soviet studies in Ukraine. Sciences of Europe, no. 101, vol. 1, 43–57. https://zenodo.org/record/7107052#.Y1AeQstByr8 [In English].


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026