ETHICS OF RESPONSIBILITY IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND INNOVATION: A GLOBAL AND NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2022.88.12-21
Abstract
The ethical dimension of scientific research and its relevance to socio-cultural transformations is traditional for philosophical discourse, however, for Ukrainian philosophy, the resolution of global and local contradictions in the development of the scientific sphere is of particular importance. The question of the ethical foundation of conducting scientific research and developing innovations, the balance between the search for scientific solutions for specific scientific problems, and the ethos of civilizational responsibility, inclusion in the civilizational agenda with its corresponding regulatory procedures, is debatable in the global research space.
Modern social turbulence leaves its mark on the field of scientific and innovative activity, which requires the adoption of an updated value paradigm in response to these challenges (global — Industry 4.0, sustainable development, etc. ); national — military aggression, political modernization, etc. ). It was possible to demonstrate that the concept of «responsible research and innovation», not only at the level of political declarations, but also of social practice, can act as a basis for the development of the Ukrainian sphere of science and innovative development. The real practice of implementing the ethos of responsibility in the field of science and innovation requires not only a developed state policy, but also an update of the key provisions of the philosophy of education in the field of training scientifically gifted youth.
Keywords
Full Text:
>PDF (Українська)
References
Horbov, V.V. & Batrak, D.A. (2020). Sotsial’na turbulentnist’ yak stan suchasnoho suspil’stva. Tradytsiyi ta novatsiyi u rozvytku suchasnoyi sotsiolohichnoyi nauky: doslidzhennya molodykh vchenykh. Kyiv: KNEU, 183–186 [in Ukrainian].
Zubov, V.O. & Kryveha, L.D. (2015). Sotsialna turbulentnist yak pidgruntya zmin u svitohlyadnykh ustanovakh suchasnoyi lyudyny. Aktualni problemy filosofiyi ta sotsiolohiyi, 8, 66–68 [in Ukrainian].
Pinker, S. (2019). Prosvitnytstvo s’ohodni. Arhumenty na rozvytok rozumu, nauky ta prohresu. Kyiv: Nash format, 560 s. [in Ukrainian].
Shashkova, L.O. (2021). Politychnyy povorot u filosofiyi nauky. Politolohichnyy visnyk. Vyp 87. S. 14–23. https://doi. org/10.17721/2415–881x. 2021.87.14–23 [in Ukrainian]
Boenink, M., & Kudina O. (2020). Values in responsible research and innovation: from entities to practices. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7:3, 450–470. DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2020.1806451
Dahrendorf, R. (1997). The Public Responsibility of Intellectuals: Against the New Fear of the Enlightenment. In: Dahrendorf, R. (eds) After 1989. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi. org/10.1007/978–1-349–25653-2_11
Kasavin, I.T. (2019). Science and Public Good: Max Weber’s Ethical Implications. Social Epistemology, 34:2, 184–196. doi:10.1080/02691728.2019.1695010
Lindstrom, M. (2021). A brief reflection on the issue of science, ideology and critical theory. SSM — population health, 16, 100972. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. ssmph. 2021.100972
Rosenau, J.N. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. 499 p.
Sassower, R. (2021). Should Anyone Care about Scientific Progress? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 51 (1), 78–79. DOI:10.1177/0048393120916133
Sternberg, R.J. (2018). Direct Measurement of Scientific Giftedness, Roeper Review, 40:2, 78–85, doi: 10.1080/02783193.2018.1434715
Tutlys V., Bukantaite D., Melnyk S., & Anuzis A. (2021). The institutional development of skills formation in Lithuania and Ukraine: Institutional settings, critical junctures and policy transfer. Research in Comparative and International Education, 16 (4), 430–432. DOI:10.1177/17454999211057448
Young, K. L. (2020). Progress, pluralism and science: moving from alienated to engaged pluralism. Review of International Political Economy, 28:2, 406–420. doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1830833
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The editorial board does not always share the position of the authors. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material presented.
All rights reserved.
© Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 2026






